Home › Tools › Opportunity Index › NH-765

NH-765 charging corridor analysisResearch beta

Highway corridor screening across Telangana

181Cells on corridor

99Best car score

84Best truck score

56Stations within 5 km

Corridor sites behave differently from urban ones. The model uses a wider supply radius on corridors (25 km for cars, 30 km for trucks) than in cities (3 km), because a driver on a highway will divert far further than one in traffic. A corridor cell scoring lower than an urban one is not necessarily a worse opportunity — it is being judged against a much larger catchment.

Highest-scoring cells on NH-765

Cell	Car score	Truck score	Centroid
8860a25b57fffff	99	44	17.371, 78.482
8860a25b0bfffff	99	44	17.378, 78.486
8860a25b1dfffff	98	43	17.378, 78.478
8860a25b03fffff	98	43	17.386, 78.482
8860a25b15fffff	97	43	17.386, 78.473
8860a25b19fffff	97	43	17.371, 78.473
8860a25b13fffff	97	42	17.378, 78.460
8860a25b11fffff	97	43	17.378, 78.469

These are area centroids at roughly 5.3 km² resolution outside Hyderabad — starting points for investigation, not plots.

Existing public charging along the route

56 station record(s) sit within 5 km of a cell on this corridor.

Operators present: Statiq (43), ChargeZone (5), Tata Power EV Charging Solutions (3), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation (3), Reliance BP Mobility (2).

What still needs verifying

Traffic — modelled from road class and population, not counted.
Grid capacity — sanctioned load at a specific plot is unknown. Across Telangana, higher-scoring cells correlate with lower sanctioned capacity (p=0.006), so connection cost and lead time may be worse than the score suggests.
Land — availability, price and access sit entirely outside the model.
Real competition — including chargers no public source lists.

Explore the corridor on the map Request a corridor verification